GISRUK 2010 abstract submissions

7 12 2009

Well we’ve just pushed past 100 abstracts submitted for the next GISRUK conference at UCL next April. We defined several themes in line with the interests of UCL, the London location for the conference and the “Global Challenges” overall theme. This is how the abstracts have split out:

  • Crime and Place (7 submissions)
  • Environmental Change (6 submissions)
  • Geodemographics and population (8 submissions)
  • Human-Computer Interaction, Usability and Geovisualisation (8 submissions)
  • Intelligent Transport (6 submissions)
  • London as a global city (4 submissions)
  • Migration and Identity (1 submissions)
  • Open GIS and Volunteered Geographic Information (9 submissions)
  • The geoweb and neo-geography (13 submissions)
  • Public Health and Epidemiology (8 submissions)
  • Simulation and Modelling (27 submissions)
  • Other (5 submissions)

We’ll actually close the submission tomorrow (as I write), 7th December, so if you’ve a paper ready to go, there’s still the chance to get in there! It seems that webGIS in its various forms is a popular topic still.





GISRUK 2010 – paper deadline approaching

3 11 2009

UCL is hosting this year’s GIS Research UK (GISRUK) conference, mostly because I landed them with it. As a result I’m co-chairing this with Muki Haklay at UCL. We hope to attract the regular GISRUK crowd but also to bring in a slightly wider audience of people whose disciplines use or connect to GIS. The paper deadline is approaching at the end of this month, so now’s the time to get writing.

GISRUK is an annual, academic conference series that has been running since 1993. It’s a relatively informal conference and aims to be a good place for PhD students and others to make their first presentations in academic GIS. GISRUK traditionally just takes extended abstracts – the best contributions are invited to go on to be written up as full papers or book chapters. While it focuses on the UK academic GIS community, we usually have people from around Europe and further afield attending. Nor are we exclusive to academics – abstracts are judged on their merits and anyone is free to attend.

Our overarching theme this year be “Global Challenges”. As is usual with GISRUK we welcome papers across the range of contemporary GIS research but we will particularly welcome papers in the following themes:
  • Crime and Place
  • Environmental Change
  • Migration and Identity
  • Intelligent Transport
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Simulation and Modelling
  • London as a global city
  • The geoweb and neo-geography
  • Open GIS and Volunteered Geographic Information
More details of the call for papers, abstract format, and the submission URL can all be found on the conference website: http://gisruk2010.spatial-literacy.org/.  The closing date for abstracts is Friday 27th November 2009.
We also have a Twitter id, GISRUK2010 you can follow for updates.




Alton Towers – the best theme park in the UK?

2 10 2009

A couple of weekends ago I visited the Alton Towers theme park which is just 50 miles from our new home in Nottingham. Probably for that same reason the University of Nottingham have a number of links with Alton Towers too, not least through our new Digital Economies hub and doctoral training centre (DTC), so there was some professional interest in an otherwise family visit. My perception of Alton Towers has always been that it’s the premier theme park in the UK and it’s this I want to reflect on in this post.

My first visit to Alton Towers must have been in the mid-90s as a single male in his 20s. Thrill rides were the thing. I went back with friends after the opening of rides like Nemesis and Oblivion but then haven’t been for a while. For context, I’ve been to Disney parks in the US, Japan and France and Universal Studios and Busch Gardens in Florida. Again, mostly for the thrill rides. In the UK I went to Chessington and Thorpe Park in the 90s too.

Of course now my circumstances are different, with a wife and young family (both kids under 5). We recently went to Legoland near Windsor for a family day out (tip: spending Tesco Clubcard vouchers on this is cost effective!). After a great day out we figured that we could probably get good value from a Merlin annual pass, which gets you into Thorpe Park, Chessington, Alton Towers, the London Eye, and various other attractions. As a result, in the last few months I’ve been to all of the latter. We also went to Disney near Paris in 2008.

An interesting side note – though Merlin are the park operators they no longer own Alton Towers. The park was part of a leaseback scheme a couple of years ago. The Alton Towers park is an interesting place itself, of course, with a long history of decline leading eventually to its opening as pleasure gardens and then its eventual evolution into a theme park. It’s been through a number of owners in its guise as a theme park. (There’s a potted history on Wikipedia). One thing in particular that separates Alton Towers from many other theme parks (e.g. Chessington) is that there is lots of space, both for expansion and between the ride areas.

So, what of the park nowadays? Well the thrill rides are still there and there are new ones since I was last there (Spinball Whizzer, Air & Rita in particular). Also, like many places Alton Towers runs a parent pass scheme . You get a card listing each ride; one parent queues for a ride and gets the card stamped just before going on the ride; then the other parent can jump to the front of the queue (often in front of the fast pass line) and ride quickly. You of course have to have the kids with you to get the card. This scheme works doubly well if you buy one fast pass ticket so the first parent uses a fast pass to skip a lot of the main queue. So my wife and I were happy because we could get round the thrill rides. (I just wish that I hadn’t built up so much of a tolerance for these rides – the adrenalin and anticipation of the rides just isn’t there so much any more, though being on the rides is still fun.)

So far, so good. I think there are two issues though – one relating to having the kids along, and the other relating to the zoning and park experience.

Of course taking kids to a theme park should be a great day out for everyone (especially with the parent pass, etc.). Our experience of Alton Towers was that the kids rides are perhaps too concentrated in a couple of zones. Thorpe Park, for example, seems to have kids rides much closer to the thrill rides so everyone can be happy. Because of the larger size of the Alton Towers park, it’s actually quite a trek (especially with short under-5 legs) between the zones. Still, the rides themselves are fun (though the Charlie and The Chocolate Factory ride doesn’t really work in my opinion – it’s trying to be too macabre, doesn’t really fill the space, the animatronics and pretty poor and it doesn’t really convey the narrative of the story).

And then there’s the zones of the park. This needs some serious rethinking (tricky of course, given the rides are fixed!). The zone with Oblivion (X-Sector) feels like a half abandoned corner, Ug Land makes no sense (the Rita roller coaster is based on a drag racing theme or something and just doesn’t fit the prehistoric theme), and Storybook Land has almost nothing in it. The main entrance way, Towers Street, is a sad reflection of the main streets of places like Disney with mostly closed building hoardings rather than exciting retail outlets. All in all, I feel that Alton Towers has been resting on its laurels, relying on the thrill rides to bring people in, but in my view these parks are about the whole experience, including its weird internal logic, and not just the rides. My suspicion is that the period of ownership by Dubai International Capital, part of the Dubai sovereign wealth fund, is when the vision was lost but this is only because I suspect an investment business probably has less specific interest in the theme park business. This lack of focus on the park as a whole is also reflected in the gardens areas. The plants are reasonably well maintained and the fish thrive in the ponds but architectural features, such as the Gothic Prospect Tower seem to have been allowed to decay. Couldn’t some of the income from the rest of the park keep some of this heritage alive? Similarly, down in the gardens areas there are buildings, including what looks like an old tea room. OK, I’m middle aged and a father now (how did that happen?) – I could have killed for a decent cup of tea and some cake at a quiet spot in the gardens. It seems like a missed opportunity in the family market.

Best ride? Probably Spinball Whizzer – not the most intense ride but having the car spin round so you’re facing different directions through the ride was an exciting addition, adding a new dynamic I hadn’t experienced before.

And the ‘geo’ aspect?  Well the park’s crying out for better mapping: tailored mapping and interactive mapping are possibilities, but even the current all-in-one map could be greatly improved to help route finding through the park. Don’t put labels over the junctions! And how about virtual games in the park areas too, a form of location based activity?





Geobingo!

24 09 2009

The AGI Soapbox has happened. Now of course I’m biased, but it seemed to go off pretty well. A room full of folks (and their ononmies), armed with geobeers and 10 presentations from souls brave or foolhardy enough to risk this format. I think it was the right decision to withhold the titles and let it unfold on the evening. We had a variety:

  1. Steven Ramage, 1Spatial – “THE LANGUAGE OF BUSINESS” – mostly serious
  2. Addy Pope, EDINA – “Go-Geo! – a geo-information discovery tool and GeoDoc – a metadata creation and management tool.  What can they do for you?” – title length probably says why this didn’t work in this format
  3. Gary Gale, Yahoo! – ““Neo this” and “paleo that”, it’s all just “Geo” – worked overall, amusing but maybe not quite enough to say on each slide?
  4. Simon Lewis, MapJuice; John Fagan, Microsoft – “15 “geoweb” innovations since AGI Geocommunity 08″ – competent but probably not memorable (ask me in a month’s time for the 15 innovations!)
  5. Ian Painter, Snowflaks – “Behind every great Neogeographer is a Paleotard” - I suspect audience vote for nailing it with a funny presentation with a well delivered payload. Certainly got my vote.
  6. Andrew Larcombe, Net Dojo – “Serious (geo) play, or ‘why we need to be open to innovate’” - message fine but not punchy enough in the delivery
  7. Chris Parker, Ordnance Survey – “Geovation” – presentation was fine but peculiar scheme…
  8. Chris Osborne, ITO World – Ito! – bombed. Pitch, not enough to say on each slide. 20 secs can be a long time…
  9. Mark Bishop, Chris McCartney, Tom Probert,  PBBI – geogags! Nah.
  10. Peter Batty, Spatial Networking – Queen Vanessa! And a hat.

This is a more difficult format that it first appears. 20 secs can be longer than some appreciated. And if you don’t go with a message, you need good gags.

We had a Geobingo winner, Andrew Newman of Natural England – congratulations! Personally I was just relieved that one of the cards came through…

Thanks go to: Hayley Merrill from 1Spatial for keeping the Geobingo scorecard, getting the cards out there, giving the prize, etc.; Steven Ramage for the Geobingo idea; Nick Summers for setting up the Twitterfall (Swisscom fail, though in extremis) & videoing; Chris Holcroft for loan of the PA kit; and the speakers for sticking their necks out on this.

I hope I’ll be the one to be back with this next year! And so to geobed, before chairing the not-the-keynotes-and-not-the-geoweb SDI stream first thing tomorrow. See you at 9:45.

Yikes!





AGI Soapbox ready to go

22 09 2009

Everything’s as ready as it can be for the Soapbox event at the AGI GeoCommunity conference tomorrow. I have 9 presentations loaded up from the following speakers:

  1. Steven Ramage, 1Spatial
  2. Addy Pope, EDINA
  3. Gary Gale, Yahoo!
  4. Simon Lewis, MapJuice; John Fagan, Microsoft
  5. Andrew Larcombe, Net Dojo
  6. Ian Holt, Chris Parker, Ordnance Survey
  7. Chris Osborne, ITO World
  8. Mark Bishop, Chris McCartney, Tom Probert,  PBBI
  9. Peter Batty, Spatial Networking

and we’ve filled the last-minute slot too – Ian Painter and Eddie Curtis from Snowflake will also present. Each presentation will last 5 minutes, comprising a fixed structure of 15 slides, 20 seconds a piece. The presentations are quite a mix: presentations on business communication, product pitches, barbed commentaries on the geo scene, and finally straightforward geo joke telling.

I suspect that the fixed format where presenters have no control over their slides once the presentation starts will prove quite a difficult style to master. 20 seconds a slide can be a long time or a really short time if you misjudge your timings… Who will fly, who will die? We’ll see tomorrow evening from 5:30 in the bar before the AGI party!

To add some additional audience interest we will also be running a game of bingo (Geobingo, in fact, brought to you from an original idea by 1Spatial) – geojargon spotting made fun, with a prize for the winner.

If you’re at the conference, you can give live feedback to the speakers through Twitter: we’ll have a Twitterfall of comments with the #geocom tag running during the Soapbox event. If you’re not at the conference (shame on you! ;-) you can get a feel for the event by following us on Twitter and we’ll try to upload at least the best presentations to YouTube.





#geocom – ready to go…

22 09 2009

Lunchtime on the day before AGI Geocommunity kicks off… We’ve spent the morning setting up (mostly stuffing conference bags and working out how to populate the GeoCommmunity Live blog). Pics here. Meanwhile Pitney Bowes and Oracle have been running user group sessions, and this afternoon there’s the chance to try geocaching or OpenStreet Mapping. Things seem to be very well sorted, not least due to Claire Huppertz’ efforts at the AGI in pulling together the programme, sponsors, hotel & catering, oh, and everything else.





iTunes or Spotify, or, how much music do I really need to own?

18 09 2009

Growing up, there were two ways to buy music albums: on vinyl record or cassette. (Bear with me, we’ll get to Spotify eventually). Since cassettes degraded by being played or got eaten eventually by the tape player it was usually better to buy the record and then record it to tape. The advantage of tape was portability, to use in a car or a Walkman-like player. The only real choice here was what sort of tape you bought (ferric/chrome/etc.) and whether Dolby noise suppression was supported or worth it.

Then came CDs. Now there were two choices for the stable, archive format (that’s the way I was looking at it, even if not in those words). Initially CDs were more expensive than records so there was a period where I judged how much I valued the album and then decided to buy it on record (cheaper, and I perceived them to be of lower quality) or CD. For me, the loss of album art with CDs wasn’t such a big issue.

In the end of course CDs came down in price and I stopped buying vinyl. It was around 7 years ago that I stopped really playing my vinyl albums. This was mostly to do with moving in with my now wife and a change of lifestlye.

At a similar time I started to stop playing cassette tapes. First of all I switched to the technology I’d always (effectively) wished I’d had for personal stereos: MP3 players. I won’t bother with the list of players I’ve had but I’m currently on a fifth gen. iPod with video. It’s a separate post perhaps to discuss why I’m not onto a iPod Touch or iPhone yet.

Cassettes hung on for a while though as a convenient way to play music in the car, especially as I only had a tape/radio in my Elise. The death knell for tapes was really the purchase of one of those devices which look like a tape with a lead coming off to plug into the headphones port of, in my case, an iPod. Looking back, I’m glad I skipped the minidisc technology, etc.

Although I’d essentially stopped buying vinyl because CDs were easier and as cheap, the adoption of an MP3 player would I suspect have spelled the end anyway. At the time in particular (end of 2002 / early 2003), there was no good, quick way to rip music from vinyl – with CDs you just popped them in the computer and software took care of it for you (N2MP3 initially, then iTunes).

(Of course since then the record companies have tried messing around with the CD format to insert noise bursts to try to foil this. As far as I’m concerned this is just pushing me more towards digital music and is selling a broken medium since often these don’t play or don’t play properly as audio CDs in a computer CD-ROM drive. It’s a clumsy attempt to foil piracy which harms their normal users more than the pirates, I suspect. Blogging note to self: should I be going off and sourcing properly researched articles?..)

So, that was the brave new world: in my case, iTunes + iPod has served me very well for 5-6 years. Mostly this has been a pretty stable situation. A trend during this time though has been a slow shift from buying CDs to buying more, digitally, through iTunes. I actually still prefer to buy CDs – it’s a hard medium that survives most things except a house fire if at all looked after (i.e. the kids don’t chew them and you don’t leave them to slide around in the car). But I’ve had less time to go out and buy them; digital purchases gets you the music now rather than in 1-2 days from Play (or insert your favourite retailer here); and as I mentioned I’m pissed off at buying useless “CDs” that have been deliberately corrupted to stop me using them this way.

I perceive the impermanence of digital media to be a particular problem though and back up my music on a couple of hard drives (one via Time Machine and one via Backup – I’m a Mac user) and the cloud (MobileMe – at the moment, just purchased items and not ripped CDs).

I’ve found though that there’s been a subtle, emergent problem. I just don’t know my music and what I own any more. I think this comes from two sources. Firstly, in the CD age, there was the process of finding the/a CD case to get the CD to play the music. There was a physical reality to the music which my brain could catalogue. On the other hand, perhaps I have too much music now.

What’s too much music? Isn’t that as weird a concept as too many books?

This relates to my use of new music. There’s the “getting to know you” or “in love” period where I play the album or track a lot (and it floats to the top of my last.fm play counts). Then with time it gets played less and subsides to some background play frequency. Now, the more music I’ve acquired, the more an album has to ‘fight’ to get background play time. I also have to remember that it’s there, and this relates back to the previous point. I just don’t find the catalogue in iTunes enough to get a mental picture of all the music I have and could play. Maybe in part it’s because I don’t really use coverflow (to fiddly to flick through and I don’t recognise many of the covers now). And on the iPod I have there isn’t a coverflow option – it’s just lists.

I’m discounting age here.

This probably also connects back to those days of tapes and making compilations from albums; or simply having an evening in listening to tracks off different CDs. That bred more familiarity with the music and its album container. This lack of familiarity is compounded by the seductions of random play on an iPod – can’t decide what album or playlist to play? Just stick it on Shuffle.

Maybe there’s an issue too with having an increasing library of music and hence some form of musical experience that means that new music has to be more different and appealing to be remembered. I’m undecided about this – there’s lots of good new music out there still.

So, recently, I’ve been wondering whether to buy as much and probably have slowed down in buying music. This is where I hope to use Spotify. My plan is to play-test music through Spotify. This currently means listening from my laptop or desktop machine (Spotify don’t support Nokia/Symbian (yet?) and my iPod’s too old to have a network connection, etc.). Then if I think an album has actually been worth it, I’ll buy a copy in/to import into iTunes to keep and have on the iPod. Music I’m less keen to own I can always go back to in Spotify.

Is this the start of another shift, to subscribing to a cloud database of music and not owning it myself? I’m not sure. Spotify could help drag me across if their client could scan my iTunes library, both to pre-populate Spotify with a list of my favourite music for easy access, and to import my current playlists. (A moving target for Spotify given Apple’s attempts to keep its platform private, e.g. modifying the iTunes database structure between iTunes versions).

There’s one side issue of effectively re-purchasing a licence to the music I’ve already bought but Spotify’s monthly subscription is currently about the same as one new album a month so maybe that’s not too bad.

A big downside though is that you can only play the network music in Spotify’s database. What about podcasts / iPlayer /etc.? What about online radio (iTunes aggregates real radio station sources; Spotify’s “radio” is really a guided random playlist)? What about video (I watch TV programmes on my iPod when travelling)?

Overall then I think Spotify will remain a music pre-purchase solution for me for now and another source of random playlist radio. But these shifts are gradual and based on utility for me – and my listening opportunities are different now I don’t have 2 hours a day commuting by train.

If I’m still blogging in a year or two, maybe I’ll come back to this.





Back from London

16 09 2009

I’ve been back down to UCL this afternoon for the final poster presentations of the Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering MSc students (not just the geomatics students but these were the ones I was concerned with). Why go down for this? Well, I was almost in the area (OK, Northampton) for a meeting anyway. And more importantly having supervised 6 or 7 projects it seemed important for the students concerned that there would be someone there who was really interested in their work.

The posters replaced the previous practice in the former Geomatic Engineering of final presentations. Was this better? Well it certainly allowed the process to be quicker and it’s a different form of presentation for the students to practise (assuming they get presentation practice elsewhere in the MSc). Whether they each get the same level of attention from the academic staff I’m not convinced – it’s much more dependent on the academics concerned (whereas with presentations the keener academics effectively covered for those who didn’t make it to student presentations).

Never go back, they say and there was some of that here. It was strange to parachute in (I made it down relatively late in proceedings). I guess I felt I was doing a form of good deed <<never goes unpunished>> but of course so soon after leaving one gets pulled back into the relationships with the people there. The process of moving to Nottingham is still on-going.

And the posters? Mostly professional attempts and a wide and interesting range of topics. It was certainly worth going for the stated purpose – catching the students and their work at the end of their year at UCL.

It was a great trip back from Northampton too – clear roads, loud music… (See jmorley @ last.fm for some idea of what I was listening to – I’m making the leap here to assume you might actually be interested).





Preparing for AGI Geocommunity 09

15 09 2009

One of my tasks for the week, brought with me from UCL, is to review the papers that have been submitted for next week’s AGI Geocommunity conference as part of the Best Paper Award judging. We have an excellent range of papers for the conference this year, from bedrock, traditional GIS business to new geoweb business models and examinations of the return on investment of GIS in business. And this year many more of the speakers have delivered written papers so we have the pleasant difficulty of more papers than expected to read through!

My particular job next week (in addition to chairing a session) will be to run the Soapbox. This is a series of quickfire talks in the bar after the end of the regular conference on Wednesday and before the party. 10 speakers, 15 slides each on a fixed 20 second timer each. We (the conference team) are hoping that it’ll be relatively light-hearted and snappy while people get ready for the party. You’ll be able to follow reactions to the soapbox talks on Twitter – as indeed we will in the bar with a twitterfall display on another screen of real-time reactions to the talks

More later. I plan to blog during the conference, and we’ll have a live blog from the conference organisers during the conference itself. The general Twitter tag for the conference is #geocom. You can find the conference programme here. You can still get day tickets for this increasingly popular conference.





Hello world!

8 09 2009

So here’s my start in the world of blogging. And co-incidentally it’s also the start of a new job, as Deputy Director of the Centre for Geospatial Science at the University of Nottingham. After around 12 years as a lecturer at UCL it’s felt like a big step to move jobs. On the other hand, I think I (and my family) already feel pretty settled in Nottingham. But it’ll take a while just to find my way around Nottingham, its systems, etc.

This is a different role from that at UCL – much less teaching or responsibility for teaching, more research focus, and of course working with Mike Jackson to keep money flowing into the Centre to enable its world-class research.

My aim is that this blog will come round to thoughts on aspects of  geospatial research and not so much a commentary on what I’m doing day to day but we’ll see. Maybe there’ll be some other non-work thoughts and news too. Like, were Muse deliberately trying to sound like Queen on some of the tracks on their new album?